Well that last part is a US specific issue and people have the right to refuse treatment
Well that last part is a US specific issue and people have the right to refuse treatment
Having to buy a number of in game coins that doesn’t match the price of items should be illegal
They do layoffs and rehire later though
Aaaand you’re low-key defending authoritarianism…
But if you’re anti fascism but pro authoritarianism, you’re still wrong…
You can have a non-US centric point of view without defending Russia or Chinese genocides…
I think it’s just basic etiquette to mention that a link is NSFW when you’re sharing it in a regular conversation, no matter the context.
Yay, more game devs lost to the Valve machine, never to complete a project again.
Maybe mark your link as NSFW?
They can’t write their own laws and their terms of service can’t go against your local laws if they want to provide their services in your State (in the general sense, not in the USA sense), so customer protection laws can solve the issue if Nintendo won’t solve it themselves.
It’s as if customer protection laws are necessary… A whole bunch of things found in EULA doesn’t apply to me just because of where I live and the fact that we have them here.
Ok, doesn’t make what I said wrong
And the same thing is true for private businesses, most of the time they’re only private in the sense that the “shares” aren’t listed on the stock market, there’s still a bunch of investors behind the scene that each own a certain % of the company, it’s not just the figurehead that acts like they’re the sole owner (see Twitter with Musk and the documents released recently showing how much money for the purchase came from third parties).
And when voter fraud is found… It’s Republicans.
“If I feel like I could justify doing it then that means they can do the same so I better do it to compensate for them doing it!” But the truth is, the other side isn’t doing it…
Pointing out their hypocrisy?
You’re certainly ripe for the taking for the incel movement I can tell you that…
So you’re mad that people have the same criterias you do?
I thought it was just that they’re set far into the future
Or it’s clearly just an excuse and there’s something else about OP
Wouldn’t that open the door to the bill being declared illegal since you didn’t consent to the services?