Again, ghost is actively working on this?
Again, ghost is actively working on this?
So two things
Activity pub is federation. So you’d be publishing to anywhere. Which as I said before, ghost is actively working on. They have a weekly mailer.
If your looking for an algorithm publishing centre, your going to find open source to be lacking. Generally speaking people who are looking for open source, don’t want the algorithmic feeding that your describing.
I self host ghost but they do offer a hosted version. It’s open source as well. They’re even working on activity pub integration!
Honestly no, and that’s okay?
Early web2 websites like MySpace did become “popular”. But IMO one of its layckings was trying out web2 by evolving something from web1’s static websites.
Where Facebook is the platform that popularized web2 in a way that worked with what web2 was and fundamentally build something new off of that.
I think Lemmy/mastatdon/most current federated clones that exist today won’t last all that long. Something that is built with federation to its core and instead of just being a feature, is central to its offering.
What is that? Not a god damn clue.
But I’m excited to try it out.
Disclaimer: not a historian. Born in the early 90s so a lot of my judgement above is bassed off of foggy memories and are my opinions and only opions.
You have to find the shop and pay some gold, but when you equip them you get +2 programming and can be combined with BLÅHAJ for +2 gender euphoria.
Except they can’t? Because the world itself doesn’t repeat like that.
Also we’re not talking a doubling of the area. We are talking 1:1 of the entire earth. Starting from satellite images.
We’re estimating once a decade. Not thousands a day.
Could the estimates be wildly off? Yes. But that’s still pretty wild conjecture lol.
While it used to be closed source the maintainer a couple years back decided to not make it a job, and open sourced, took down the hosted option, and nowaintains it as a side project open sourced.
I don’t see how a polite lie is better no.
I don’t understand why you’d want to see people lie to you. That just seems like a waste of everyone’s time to me.
But then what’s the point of the feature if no one is telling the truth?
I mean it’s always a good assumption nowadays with chat gpt
Both Ubuntu and mint are debian based.
Sync the internal drive cache with the disk. IIRC
That assumes dev resources are limitless. And for a company the size of proton that’s certainly not true.
They can only have X amount of devs. So how they allocate them says a lot.
Also given that most complaints I’ve seen at the top are about specific missing features for ages, I think it’s safe they’re putting their eggs into too many baskets.
That assumes you don’t value your time spent dealing with troubles that come.
Like the other person said, it’s fine if you don’t, but for me it’s worth a little upfront cost to have to deal with less ordering new drives, putting the drive in the server, monitor rebuilding of the array, ect…
None of that is an excuse for lack of proper backups. Because even new drives can fail catastrophically.
That’s still a lot of words to say nothing of actual value. Are you sure you’re not a. LLM?
For the record, it doesn’t matter if my ideas are better, it’s yours has to be better than the currently available models.
So again, with out any kind of testable theory, how can yours be better?
There is nothing stopping you from publishing a paper on this. But you can’t just postulate something to sound smart.
Because that sounded like a chat gpt answer.
In case you actually want an answer, is what observable effects would that have, and can we verify them?
If the answer is no, then it’s not a better theory than shrugging your shoulders and saying dark matter.
I’d recommend you sign up for their mailer. I don’t have the link off hand but it shouldn’t be hard to find.