• IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Which homes? The ones that are already in short supply? The ones that are currently being rented out? Would that mean nationalizing those buildings? Or are we building new homes? How are we paying for any of this? Raise taxes? Cut some other services?

    None of this is simple when it comes down to the details on how to actually implement it.

    • FrowingFostek@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 months ago

      This is why I like the idea of a crushingly punitive vacancy tax.

      In my opinion maximum occupancy should be the goal in a city. If no one lives in an empty space the tax increases exponentially.

      Of course, this would never happen but, I can dream.

      • TheDoozer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        This and huge taxes on AirBnBs. I live on an island that is a regular tourist spot, and housing is so scarce there are people who work full time living in tents in the woods because they can’t find a place to live.

        In Alaska.

        And there are still a bunch of AirBnBs here.

        • reddig33@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 months ago

          AirBNB/short term rentals shouldn’t exist. It’s a hotel if the owner isn’t living on site. Hotels are subject to taxes, regulations, and zoning laws.

    • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yeah, you’re gonna have to back up that claim that homes are in short supply.

      Turning homes over to the commons was what I was expecting yeah. And you usually don’t have to pay when you reclaim property, so the costs are gonna be manageable.